{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-09-25T13:40:06+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-98065","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-98065","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-98065.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-98065","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98065"},"summary":{"title":"bpf: Reject key-less BTF for hash maps","description":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Reject key-less BTF for hash maps\n\nmap_check_btf() allows a key-less BTF (btf_key_type_id == 0) only for\nmaps that have a ->map_check_btf callback, and leaves the actual\ndecision to that callback. Hash maps used to have no ->map_check_btf,\nso a key-less BTF was rejected outright.\n\nThat changed when htab and rhtab gained a ->map_check_btf to register a\ndtor - htab in commit 1df97a7453ee (\"bpf: Register dtor for freeing\nspecial fields\") and rhtab in commit 6905f8601298 (\"bpf: Allow special\nfields in resizable hashtab\"). Neither looks at the key, so a key-less\nhash map now passes map_check_btf() and gets created. Reading it back\nthrough bpffs feeds the key type_id 0 into btf_type_seq_show();\nbtf_type_by_id() returns the void type, kind_ops[BTF_KIND_UNKN] is NULL,\nand btf_type_show() dereferences it:\n\nRIP: 0010:btf_type_show+0x223/0x2e0 kernel/bpf/btf.c:8232\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000399f868 EFLAGS: 00010206\nRAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000028\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: ffffc9000399f970 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffff9b96b140\nR13: ffffc9000399f8e0 R14: ffff88803d393c00 R15: 0000000000000003\nCS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000200000000000 CR3: 000000003d213000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0\nDR0: 0000000039ae8f55 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n <TASK>\n btf_type_seq_show_flags+0xca/0x120 kernel/bpf/btf.c:8250\n htab_map_seq_show_elem+0x12e/0x350 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1669\n map_seq_show+0x13d/0x1e0 kernel/bpf/inode.c:293\n traverse.part.0.constprop.0+0x107/0x650 fs/seq_file.c:112\n traverse fs/seq_file.c:99 [inline]\n seq_read_iter+0x93f/0x1270 fs/seq_file.c:196\n seq_read+0x344/0x4d0 fs/seq_file.c:163\n vfs_read+0x1e4/0xb40 fs/read_write.c:572\n ksys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:764 [inline]\n __do_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:772 [inline]\n __se_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:769 [inline]\n __x64_sys_pread64+0x1eb/0x250 fs/read_write.c:769\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\nReject a key-less BTF in htab_map_check_btf() and rhtab_map_check_btf(),\nrestoring the previous behavior.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"Linux","published_at":"2026-09-25 11:17:35","updated_at":"2026-09-25 11:17:35"},"problem_types":[],"metrics":[],"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0895a0c0734703be5532f3883c42db95615fd98b","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0895a0c0734703be5532f3883c42db95615fd98b","refsource":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ca231252820c47aaec42a5db580db98f9b64724","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ca231252820c47aaec42a5db580db98f9b64724","refsource":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-98065","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98065","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 1df97a7453eec80c1912c2d0360290a3970a7671 7ca231252820c47aaec42a5db580db98f9b64724 git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 1df97a7453eec80c1912c2d0360290a3970a7671 0895a0c0734703be5532f3883c42db95615fd98b git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 7.0","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 7.0 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 7.2.7 7.2.* semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 7.3-rc2 * original_commit_for_fix","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Linux","programFiles":["kernel/bpf/hashtab.c"],"repo":"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git","vendor":"Linux","versions":[{"lessThan":"7ca231252820c47aaec42a5db580db98f9b64724","status":"affected","version":"1df97a7453eec80c1912c2d0360290a3970a7671","versionType":"git"},{"lessThan":"0895a0c0734703be5532f3883c42db95615fd98b","status":"affected","version":"1df97a7453eec80c1912c2d0360290a3970a7671","versionType":"git"}]},{"defaultStatus":"affected","product":"Linux","programFiles":["kernel/bpf/hashtab.c"],"repo":"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git","vendor":"Linux","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"7.0"},{"lessThan":"7.0","status":"unaffected","version":"0","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"7.2.*","status":"unaffected","version":"7.2.7","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"*","status":"unaffected","version":"7.3-rc2","versionType":"original_commit_for_fix"}]}],"cpeApplicability":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"7.2.7","versionStartIncluding":"7.0","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"7.3-rc2","versionStartIncluding":"7.0","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"OR"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Reject key-less BTF for hash maps\n\nmap_check_btf() allows a key-less BTF (btf_key_type_id == 0) only for\nmaps that have a ->map_check_btf callback, and leaves the actual\ndecision to that callback. Hash maps used to have no ->map_check_btf,\nso a key-less BTF was rejected outright.\n\nThat changed when htab and rhtab gained a ->map_check_btf to register a\ndtor - htab in commit 1df97a7453ee (\"bpf: Register dtor for freeing\nspecial fields\") and rhtab in commit 6905f8601298 (\"bpf: Allow special\nfields in resizable hashtab\"). Neither looks at the key, so a key-less\nhash map now passes map_check_btf() and gets created. Reading it back\nthrough bpffs feeds the key type_id 0 into btf_type_seq_show();\nbtf_type_by_id() returns the void type, kind_ops[BTF_KIND_UNKN] is NULL,\nand btf_type_show() dereferences it:\n\nRIP: 0010:btf_type_show+0x223/0x2e0 kernel/bpf/btf.c:8232\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000399f868 EFLAGS: 00010206\nRAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000028\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: ffffc9000399f970 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffff9b96b140\nR13: ffffc9000399f8e0 R14: ffff88803d393c00 R15: 0000000000000003\nCS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000200000000000 CR3: 000000003d213000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0\nDR0: 0000000039ae8f55 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n <TASK>\n btf_type_seq_show_flags+0xca/0x120 kernel/bpf/btf.c:8250\n htab_map_seq_show_elem+0x12e/0x350 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1669\n map_seq_show+0x13d/0x1e0 kernel/bpf/inode.c:293\n traverse.part.0.constprop.0+0x107/0x650 fs/seq_file.c:112\n traverse fs/seq_file.c:99 [inline]\n seq_read_iter+0x93f/0x1270 fs/seq_file.c:196\n seq_read+0x344/0x4d0 fs/seq_file.c:163\n vfs_read+0x1e4/0xb40 fs/read_write.c:572\n ksys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:764 [inline]\n __do_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:772 [inline]\n __se_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:769 [inline]\n __x64_sys_pread64+0x1eb/0x250 fs/read_write.c:769\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\nReject a key-less BTF in htab_map_check_btf() and rhtab_map_check_btf(),\nrestoring the previous behavior."}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-09-25T10:24:08.406Z","orgId":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","shortName":"Linux"},"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ca231252820c47aaec42a5db580db98f9b64724"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0895a0c0734703be5532f3883c42db95615fd98b"}],"title":"bpf: Reject key-less BTF for hash maps","x_generator":{"engine":"bippy-1.2.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","assignerShortName":"Linux","cveId":"CVE-2026-98065","datePublished":"2026-09-25T10:24:08.406Z","dateReserved":"2026-09-25T10:19:56.073Z","dateUpdated":"2026-09-25T10:24:08.406Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-09-25 11:17:35","lastModifiedDate":"2026-09-25 11:17:35","problem_types":[],"metrics":[],"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"98065","Ordinal":"1","Title":"bpf: Reject key-less BTF for hash maps","CVE":"CVE-2026-98065","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"98065","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Reject key-less BTF for hash maps\n\nmap_check_btf() allows a key-less BTF (btf_key_type_id == 0) only for\nmaps that have a ->map_check_btf callback, and leaves the actual\ndecision to that callback. Hash maps used to have no ->map_check_btf,\nso a key-less BTF was rejected outright.\n\nThat changed when htab and rhtab gained a ->map_check_btf to register a\ndtor - htab in commit 1df97a7453ee (\"bpf: Register dtor for freeing\nspecial fields\") and rhtab in commit 6905f8601298 (\"bpf: Allow special\nfields in resizable hashtab\"). Neither looks at the key, so a key-less\nhash map now passes map_check_btf() and gets created. Reading it back\nthrough bpffs feeds the key type_id 0 into btf_type_seq_show();\nbtf_type_by_id() returns the void type, kind_ops[BTF_KIND_UNKN] is NULL,\nand btf_type_show() dereferences it:\n\nRIP: 0010:btf_type_show+0x223/0x2e0 kernel/bpf/btf.c:8232\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000399f868 EFLAGS: 00010206\nRAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000028\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: ffffc9000399f970 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffff9b96b140\nR13: ffffc9000399f8e0 R14: ffff88803d393c00 R15: 0000000000000003\nCS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000200000000000 CR3: 000000003d213000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0\nDR0: 0000000039ae8f55 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n <TASK>\n btf_type_seq_show_flags+0xca/0x120 kernel/bpf/btf.c:8250\n htab_map_seq_show_elem+0x12e/0x350 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1669\n map_seq_show+0x13d/0x1e0 kernel/bpf/inode.c:293\n traverse.part.0.constprop.0+0x107/0x650 fs/seq_file.c:112\n traverse fs/seq_file.c:99 [inline]\n seq_read_iter+0x93f/0x1270 fs/seq_file.c:196\n seq_read+0x344/0x4d0 fs/seq_file.c:163\n vfs_read+0x1e4/0xb40 fs/read_write.c:572\n ksys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:764 [inline]\n __do_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:772 [inline]\n __se_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:769 [inline]\n __x64_sys_pread64+0x1eb/0x250 fs/read_write.c:769\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\nReject a key-less BTF in htab_map_check_btf() and rhtab_map_check_btf(),\nrestoring the previous behavior.","Type":"Description","Title":"bpf: Reject key-less BTF for hash maps"}]}}}